MIB: Q4 GDP Revised to 0.7%, Iran Vows Hormuz Shut, S&P Posts Third Weekly Loss, Adobe CEO Exits

Iran’s new supreme leader vows Hormuz closure permanent; WTI near $100 for second straight day. Q4 GDP revised to +0.7% — stagflation trap confirmed. S&P 500 records third consecutive weekly loss, Nasdaq -0.68%. Adobe (ADBE) -7.5% as CEO Narayen exits after 18 years despite record Q1 beat. Trump’s Russia oil sanctions relief fails, allies furious. All eyes on FOMC March 17-18 — Powell’s stagflation signal is next week’s defining risk.

The Market Intelligence Brief is a disciplined approach to daily market analysis. Using AI-assisted curation, we filter thousands of financial stories down to 15-20 that demonstrate measurable impact on the US economy/markets. Each story is evaluated and ranked – not by popularity or headlines, but by its potential effect on policy, sectors, and asset prices. Our goal is straightforward: help investors separate signal from noise, understand how today’s events connect to market direction, and make more informed decisions. Published weekdays by 18H00 EST for portfolio managers, analysts, and serious individual investors. MIB is in Beta testing phase and will evolve over time.
NOTE: For optimal readability on mobile phones or tablets, orient your device to LANDSCAPE mode.

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -> TOP

MARKET SNAPSHOT:

Markets endured a third consecutive losing week on Friday as two defining macro shocks converged: the BEA revised Q4 2025 GDP to just +0.7% annualized — the weakest growth reading in years — while Iran’s newly installed supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei declared the Strait of Hormuz closure permanent, keeping WTI crude near $100/bbl for a second straight session. The S&P 500 fell 0.32%, the Nasdaq led declines at -0.68%, and the Dow finished fractionally positive (+0.01%) as investors rotated into defensive industrials. Eight of eleven S&P 500 sectors declined, with Energy the sole meaningful gainer (+1.5% sector-wide) — this is a macro story, not a sector story, and the rotation pattern confirms institutional re-positioning toward a stagflationary regime.

TODAY AT A GLANCE:

Stagflation trap confirmed: Q4 2025 GDP revised to +0.7% (from +1.4% advance estimate) — pairing with -92K February payrolls, 3.1% core PCE, and WTI near $100 creates the most complete stagflationary data set since the 1970s oil shocks. Goldman Sachs raised 12-month recession odds to 25%; Moody’s stands at 42%; Kalshi prediction markets at 34%.

Hormuz closure holding; Trump out of options: Iran’s new Supreme Leader Khamenei issued his first public statement vowing to keep Hormuz closed. Trump’s Russian oil sanctions relief announcement failed to move oil prices; WTI settled at $98.71/bbl (+3.11%). US military acknowledged it is “not ready” to escort tankers through the strait.

DXY crosses 100: The US Dollar Index breached 100 for the first time in 2026 on safe-haven flows — a second consecutive weekly gain. Dollar strength pressures multinational earnings and commodities, compounding the stagflation dynamic.

Adobe (ADBE) -7.5%: CEO Shantanu Narayen announced his departure after 18 years; markets reacted to the leadership vacuum despite record Q1 revenue ($6.40B) and EPS beat. Lennar (LEN) also declined after missing Q1 revenue and EPS estimates as housing affordability headwinds intensified.

FOMC March 17-18 is next week’s defining risk: Fed holds expected (no cut possible with PCE at 3.1% and oil near $100), but Powell’s language on stagflation risk will directly set Q1-Q2 positioning. PPI February data also releases March 18, same day as the decision.

Michigan Consumer Sentiment hits 2026 low at 55.5: Preliminary March reading fell from 56.6 in February; year-ahead inflation expectations rose to 3.4% — snapping a 6-month declining trend. Consumer confidence below 60 has historically been associated with recessionary conditions.

KEY THEMES:

1. Stagflation Is Now Priced In, Not Just Feared — Today’s GDP revision to +0.7% completes the picture: weak growth, hot inflation, negative payrolls, and a supply-side oil shock the Fed cannot address with rate policy. The 60/40 portfolio correlation is breaking down (both stocks and bonds selling simultaneously). Institutional rotation into energy and defense is no longer a trade — it is a regime shift. Multiple compression in growth stocks has further to run.

2. Iran Oil Shock — Duration Is the Only Variable — The Trump administration has now exhausted its near-term policy tools: SPR taps signaled, Russian oil sanctions partially eased, and diplomatic pressure applied. None has moved WTI meaningfully below $100. Every additional week of Hormuz restriction adds approximately 0.2-0.3 percentage points to US CPI. Analysts at Deutsche Bank and Oxford Economics are pricing a sustained stagflation scenario, not a transient shock.

3. CEO Transitions Signal Corporate Uncertainty — Adobe’s record-beating Q1 followed immediately by a CEO departure after 18 years reflects the anxiety among enterprise software leaders navigating AI competitive disruption. The SaaS sector’s multiple compression is no longer just about rate sensitivity — it is about whether AI-native competitors are eroding moats faster than management teams can adapt. The answer from Adobe’s stock reaction: the market is not yet convinced.

RecessionALERT.com— Leading economic indicators. Accurate market forecasts. Apply for membership at join.recessionalert.com

B. MARKET DATA -> TOP

CLOSING PRICES – Friday, March 13, 2026:

MAJOR INDICES

Index Close Change %Move Why It Moved
S&P 500 6,651.32 -21.30 -0.32% GDP revised to +0.7%; WTI near $100 on Hormuz closure; tech-led selling; third consecutive weekly loss
Dow Jones 46,683.55 +5.70 +0.01% Defensive rotation into Boeing (+2.46%), UnitedHealth (+1.99%), 3M (+1.88%) offset broader weakness
Nasdaq 22,159.34 -152.64 -0.68% Adobe -7.5% on CEO departure; all Mag-7 names negative YTD 2026; growth stocks repriced under stagflation regime
Russell 2000 2,475.14 -13.86 -0.56% Small-caps disproportionately exposed to oil cost pass-through and rate sensitivity; underperformed large-caps
NYSE Composite 22,031.71 -85.92 -0.39% Broad market weakness; third consecutive weekly decline across most NYSE-listed issues

VOLATILITY & TREASURIES

Instrument Level Change Why It Moved
VIX 26.50 +2.27 (+9.4%) War premium and stagflation uncertainty elevated; elevated relative to early-year readings near 18-19
10-Year Treasury Yield 4.285% +1 bps Bear steepening: long end sticky as inflation expectations rise; 10Y-2Y spread widening signals stagflation premium
2-Year Treasury Yield 3.734% -2 bps Fell on weaker growth outlook (GDP 0.7%, UMich 55.5); market reducing near-term rate hike expectations
US Dollar Index (DXY) 100.04 +0.31 (+0.31%) Crossed 100 for first time in 2026; safe-haven demand from Iran war; second consecutive weekly gain

COMMODITIES

Asset Price Change %Move Why It Moved
Gold $5,031/oz -$20 -0.4% Slight pullback from $5,417 record high (March 3); DXY crossing 100 pressures dollar-priced gold; still near historic highs on war premium
Silver $83.85/oz -$1.89 -2.2% Dollar strength and risk-off rotation; industrial demand concerns weigh on silver vs. gold in war environment
Crude Oil (WTI) $98.71/bbl +$2.97 +3.11% Hormuz effectively closed; Brent settled above $103; Trump’s Russia sanctions relief failed to calm market; Iran drone strikes on regional port facilities
Natural Gas $3.38/MMBtu +$0.15 +4.6% Middle East supply disruption premium; LNG rerouting costs elevating; energy complex broadly firming
Bitcoin $71,348 -$1,047 -1.4% Risk-off Friday session; recovering from mid-week lows; war uncertainty suppressing speculative appetite

TOP LARGE-CAP MOVERS:

Selection criteria: US-listed companies with market cap above $25 billion that moved ±1.5% or more during the session. Movers are ranked by percentage change and capped at 5 gainers and 5 decliners. On muted trading days when fewer than 3 names meet the threshold, the largest moves are shown regardless. Moves driven by earnings, M&A, analyst actions, sector rotation, or macro catalysts are prioritized over low-volume or technical moves.

GAINERS

Company Ticker Close Change Why It Moved
Boeing BA +2.46% Won $2.34B US Air Force E-7A Wedgetail contract; defense spending rotation accelerating amid Iran war
UnitedHealth Group UNH +1.99% Defensive rotation into healthcare; investors seeking stable earnings amid tech selloff and geopolitical uncertainty
3M MMM +1.88% Defensive industrial/value rotation; classic stagflation trade favors industrials over growth
Verizon VZ +1.86% Defensive telecom/dividend yield rotation; investors fleeing tech volatility into stable cash-flow names
Charles Schwab SCHW +1.80% Financials sector outperformance; benefits from elevated rate environment; defensive positioning into weekend

DECLINERS

Company Ticker Close Change Why It Moved
Ulta Beauty ULTA ~$574 -9.46% Q4 earnings beat but FY2026 guidance missed; comp sales outlook slowed sharply; CEO cited “global uncertainty”
Adobe ADBE $255.45 -5.31% CEO Shantanu Narayen announced departure after 18 years; tepid Q2 guidance; leadership vacuum discounted despite record Q1 beat
Lennar LEN ~$88 -4.87% Q1 double miss on revenue and EPS; average home price -8% YoY; affordability headwinds accelerating
Salesforce CRM -3.27% Enterprise SaaS sector anxiety over AI disruption compressing growth stock multiples; sector-wide re-rating underway
Nvidia NVDA $180.25 -1.58% Broad tech selloff; pre-GTC 2026 conference positioning; all Mag-7 names negative YTD
RecessionALERT.com— Institutional-grade intelligence for serious investors. Apply for membership at join.recessionalert.com

C. HIGH-IMPACT STORIES -> TOP

HIGH IMPACT
BEARISH

1. Iran’s New Supreme Leader Khamenei Vows Hormuz Stays Closed Permanently — WTI Holds Near $100

The core facts:Mojtaba Khamenei — appointed Iran’s new Supreme Leader on March 9 following the death of Ali Khamenei — issued his first major public statement on March 12 vowing to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed as a “tool to pressure the enemy.” WTI crude settled at $98.71/bbl on March 13 (+3.11%), with Brent above $103/bbl for a second consecutive session. Iranian drone strikes hit port facilities at Duqm and Salalah in neighboring Gulf states. Traffic through the strait has fallen to near-zero from Western-flagged tankers, effectively blocking approximately 20 million barrels per day of global crude and product exports. The US military confirmed on March 12 it is “not ready” to escort oil tankers through the waterway. IEA’s March 2026 Oil Market Report described the disruption as “one of the largest in history.”

Why it matters:The Strait of Hormuz carries approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply. Every $10/bbl increase in crude adds approximately 0.2-0.3 percentage points to US CPI — at near-$100 WTI, the annualized inflation impact is already materializing in a Fed already constrained by 3.1% core PCE. The new Supreme Leader’s first statement foreclosing near-term resolution eliminates the market’s primary bull case (diplomatic breakthrough). Analysts at Deutsche Bank and Oxford Economics are now explicitly pricing a sustained stagflationary scenario rather than a transient shock. The US military’s admission it cannot escort tankers removes the last near-term military off-ramp as well.

What to watch:Monitor any diplomatic back-channel reporting involving Oman (traditionally the US-Iran intermediary) or UN ceasefire proposals. A WTI break above $105 would likely trigger a Fed emergency review discussion. The April 11 expiration of Trump’s Russian oil sanctions relief license is the next key policy date.

HIGH IMPACT
BEARISH

2. Q4 2025 GDP Second Estimate Slashed to +0.7% — Stagflation Trap Confirmed

The core facts:The Bureau of Economic Analysis released its Q4 2025 GDP second estimate on March 13: +0.7% annualized, revised down a full 0.7 percentage points from the advance estimate of +1.4% (released February 20). Full-year 2025 GDP was revised to +2.1% (from +2.2%). The BEA attributed approximately 1.0 percentage point of Q4 drag to the October-November 2025 government shutdown. Contributing factors included increases in consumer spending and investment, partially offset by decreases in government spending and exports. This follows Q3 2025’s +4.4% pace — a dramatic deceleration. Core PCE inflation remains at 3.1%, well above the Fed’s 2% target, and the February nonfarm payrolls print released March 6 showed -92,000 jobs.

Why it matters:A 0.7% Q4 growth print is the weakest in years and lands while oil is near $100, core PCE is at 3.1%, and payrolls turned negative. This is textbook stagflationary data — growth collapsing while inflation remains entrenched. The Fed’s dual mandate is now in direct conflict: inflation says hold (or hike), growth says cut. Because the Iran oil shock is a supply-side inflation driver, the Fed cannot solve it with rate policy — it can only suppress demand (deepening the recession) or accept inflation persistence. This sets up the most fraught FOMC meeting since 2022. Equity multiples that were priced for 2-3% growth cannot be sustained at 0.7% — and the Q4 number predates the oil shock entirely.

What to watch:Q1 2026 GDP advance estimate releases in late April — Atlanta Fed GDPNow updated to 2.7% on March 13 but does not yet fully incorporate the oil shock. Watch for GDPNow updates in the $1.5-2.0% range as oil effects flow into the model. PPI February releases March 18 (same day as FOMC decision) — a hot PPI print combined with the Fed hold could cause meaningful equity repricing.

HIGH IMPACT
UNCERTAIN

3. Trump Eases Russian Oil Sanctions — Oil Holds Near $100, European Allies Furious

The core facts:Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced on March 13 that the Trump administration is granting a 30-day license allowing the purchase of Russian crude oil and petroleum products already loaded on vessels as of March 12, effective through April 11. Approximately 124 million barrels of Russian oil stranded at sea globally is eligible under the license. The impact on oil prices was zero — WTI ended the session up 3.11% despite the announcement. European allies, including Ukraine and EU officials, expressed “dismay.” Senator Jeanne Shaheen accused the administration of “filling the Kremlin’s war coffers.” Putin’s team welcomed the move and pushed for the US to go further. Additionally, Trump separately signaled the US may tap the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

Why it matters:The failed sanctions relief move reveals three critical signals: (1) The administration has exhausted its near-term toolkit to lower oil prices — SPR, Russian sanctions, and diplomatic pressure have all been deployed or signaled without market effect; (2) The move deepens the US-European rupture at a moment of active armed conflict, potentially weakening the NATO coalition’s cohesion precisely when it matters most; (3) It is a financial windfall for Moscow during an ongoing war in which Russia is at minimum a passive beneficiary of Iran’s actions. Markets read this as confirmation that the oil shock is structural and extended, not transient. UNCERTAIN sentiment reflects genuine ambiguity: the tool failed but signals maximum political will to act; more aggressive measures (direct escort of tankers, military action in Hormuz) remain possible escalations.

What to watch:The April 11 license expiration date will require a decision: extend, expand, or let it lapse. Monitor Congressional pushback, particularly from Ukraine-aligned senators. Any SPR release announcement would be the next market-moving policy event — watch for a formal announcement in the coming days.

HIGH IMPACT
UNCERTAIN

4. Fed Trapped by Stagflation at March 17-18 FOMC — Hold Locked In, Powell’s Language Is the Risk

The core facts:The FOMC meets March 17-18 with the fed funds rate at 3.5%-3.75%, held unchanged since January 2026. Today’s data releases — Q4 GDP revised to +0.7% and University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment falling to 55.5 (2026 low) — confirm the market consensus: no rate cut is possible with core PCE at 3.1% and oil near $100, but no rate hike is politically or economically viable into a contracting economy. Market pricing implies near-zero probability of any move. PPI for February releases on the same day (March 18) as the FOMC decision, creating a compounding volatility event. Chair Powell’s press conference following the decision will be the primary market event of the week — specifically, how he frames the stagflation dilemma and whether he signals any change in the rate path.

Why it matters:The Fed’s constrained position is itself a market-moving signal. A “higher for longer” confirmation from Powell would accelerate the bond bear steepening already underway (10Y stuck at 4.285% while 2Y drops), compressing equity multiples further. Any hint at a “growth risk” acknowledgment that implicitly signals future cuts could provide temporary equity relief but risk inflation expectations becoming unanchored. The 60/40 portfolio is already breaking down (Bloomberg, March 13: “A 60-40 portfolio is no help as war drives stagflation threat”) — Powell’s framing will determine whether the correlation breakdown is temporary or structural. UNCERTAIN reflects the genuine optionality in how the Fed communicates, not the outcome (hold).

What to watch:Wednesday March 18: FOMC decision (2:00 PM ET) and Powell press conference (2:30 PM ET). Key language to monitor: any new mention of “stagflation,” changes to inflation forecast language, and whether the dot plot is revised. Also watch PPI February data (same day) — a hot print combined with the hold statement could trigger a 1-2% intraday equity swing.

HIGH IMPACT
BEARISH

5. S&P 500 Posts Third Consecutive Weekly Loss; Industrials Decouple from Tech in Stagflation Trade

The core facts:The S&P 500 closed down 0.32% Friday, completing its third consecutive weekly loss — the worst losing streak in over a year. The Nasdaq fell 0.68%, breaking below the 6,770 support level (described by analysts as a “$1 trillion tech wipeout”). The session was whipsawed: futures rallied early Friday on Trump’s Russian oil sanctions relief announcement, then sold off as crude rebounded despite the news. The Dow finished +0.01% on the back of Boeing (+2.46%), Sherwin-Williams (+2.02%), and 3M (+1.72%) — all industrial or defensive names. The energy sector gained approximately 1.5%. All seven Magnificent Seven stocks are now negative year-to-date in 2026. The XLE Energy Select SPDR ETF is up 21.6% YTD — the mirror image of tech’s losses.

Why it matters:Three consecutive weekly losses with a clear internal rotation pattern (tech down, energy and defense up, Dow flat vs. Nasdaq -0.68%) confirm institutional repositioning into a stagflationary regime. This is not a broad selloff — it is a deliberate allocation shift. The break below S&P 6,770 support is technically significant; the next major support levels are materially lower. The Dow outperforming the Nasdaq by 0.69% on a single session illustrates how value-oriented the rotation is becoming. Global context: Bloomberg reported global stocks lost $6 trillion in the week of March 9 as stagflation trades swept markets — the US is following the same pattern but with more defensive muscle (energy, defense contracts, materials).

What to watch:Watch S&P 500 for a potential test of 6,500 — the next technical support cluster — if the FOMC press conference turns hawkish or WTI breaks above $105. Monitor the spread between XLE (energy) and XLK (technology) as a real-time gauge of the stagflation trade’s intensity. A narrowing of that spread would signal rotation fatigue.

RecessionALERT.com— Quantifying recession risk so you don’t have to guess. Apply for membership at join.recessionalert.com

D. MODERATE-IMPACT STORIES -> TOP

MODERATE IMPACT
BEARISH

6. Airlines Face $24 Billion in Additional Fuel Costs at Near-$100 Oil — 2026 Earnings Guidance Imperiled

The core facts:Skift Research estimates US airlines face approximately $24 billion in additional fuel costs annually if WTI averages $96+ for the full year — requiring fare increases of 11% or more to offset. Delta, United, and American Airlines have collectively fallen 15-20% over the past month. On March 12: Southwest fell approximately 6%, American -4%, United -4%, Delta -2% (partially hedged via refinery ownership). Delta’s 2026 EPS guidance of $6.50-$7.50 and United’s $12-$14 guidance were set when fuel costs were significantly lower. Multiple analysts cut airline price targets during the week of March 9. Airfare prices are already rising (CNBC, March 12), with the increase in forward booking prices outpacing any offset from demand softness.

Why it matters:The airline sector serves as a real-time transmission mechanism for oil shocks into the broader consumer economy — when fares rise, travel behavior changes, and consumer confidence (already at 55.5 on UMich) deteriorates further. For portfolio managers, existing airline guidance (set in January) is now meaningless; the sector requires full re-underwriting at $96-100 oil. The ripple extends to hotels, tourism, and corporate travel — all of which are tied to air transport costs. The consumer bifurcation story accelerates: affluent travelers absorb fare hikes; price-sensitive travelers delay or cancel.

What to watch:Delta (DAL) and United (UAL) are the next major airline reporters — watch for any pre-announcement or guidance withdrawal. Monthly Department of Transportation fare data will show the pass-through lag. A WTI sustained above $100 for 30+ days triggers the most bearish airline scenario models.

MODERATE IMPACT
UNCERTAIN

7. The Great Sector Rotation of 2026 Accelerates — Energy +21.6% YTD, Defense Giants at 52-Week Highs

The core facts:The XLE Energy Select SPDR ETF is up 21.6% YTD as of March 13, trading near its 52-week high of $58.22. ExxonMobil and Chevron valuations are swelling on higher crude and domestic production quotas. Defense: Lockheed Martin (LMT), RTX, and Northrop Grumman (NOC) hit 52-week highs around March 10; the DOD’s FY2026 budget includes a $20.4 billion munitions push. RTX trading near $208, NOC near $747. The US defense budget has become a direct beneficiary of the Iran war escalation cycle. Conversely, XLK (technology) is the worst-performing sector YTD in 2026, with all Mag-7 names negative year-to-date.

Why it matters:UNCERTAIN reflects the dual nature of this rotation: clearly bullish for energy and defense holders, clearly bearish for tech-heavy portfolios. For the S&P 500 as an index — where technology represents approximately 30% of market cap — the rotation is net-negative for the headline index even if individual energy/defense positions are performing strongly. This is also a sector-level signal about the economic regime: energy and defense outperform in war-driven stagflation; tech and consumer discretionary underperform. The rotation is not new, but it is accelerating — the spread between XLE and XLK YTD is now approaching 30 percentage points.

What to watch:Monitor the XLE/XLK spread weekly — a narrowing would signal rotation exhaustion. Defense stocks are approaching historically elevated multiples; watch for analyst price target upgrades that reset valuation frameworks for LMT, RTX, NOC. Any diplomatic de-escalation with Iran would immediately reverse the energy/defense premium.

MODERATE IMPACT
UNCERTAIN

8. Boeing Wins $2.34 Billion E-7A Air Force Contract, But 737 MAX Wiring Issue Surfaces Simultaneously

The core facts:The US Air Force awarded Boeing a $2.34 billion contract modification for the E-7A Wedgetail (the AWACS replacement program), bringing total program value to $5.01 billion with completion targeted by August 2032. Boeing stock gained 2.46% on the news — the strongest large-cap gainer in the S&P 500 Friday. Simultaneously, Boeing disclosed “small scratches” on electrical wiring bundles in undelivered 737 MAX jets, triggering a temporary halt to some deliveries. Boeing also holds a $289 million Israel contract for 5,000 smart bombs as defense spending globally accelerates. Stock has gained alongside broader defense names amid the Iran war spending cycle.

Why it matters:UNCERTAIN captures the simultaneous positive (defense contract) and negative (commercial production halt) signals. Boeing’s recovery thesis rests on the normalization of 737 MAX deliveries — any new quality issue that slows deliveries directly delays the cash flow ramp that bulls are pricing in. On the other hand, the defense business is increasingly the near-term earnings driver: at $5B in E-7A value plus Israel contracts, Boeing’s defense division is performing strongly. Net: defense supports the stock near-term; the wiring issue is a watch item, not yet a thesis-breaker, but it extends the reputational recovery timeline.

What to watch:Watch for the FAA’s assessment of the wiring issue scope — if it expands beyond undelivered jets to in-service aircraft, the regulatory escalation risk grows significantly. Monitor delivery numbers in Boeing’s next monthly order/delivery report.

MODERATE IMPACT
BEARISH

9. Meta’s Flagship AI Model “Avocado” Misses Internal Benchmarks — Launch Delayed to May

The core facts:The New York Times reported on March 12-13 that Meta’s flagship large language model, code-named “Avocado,” failed internal benchmarks, underperforming Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic on reasoning, coding, and writing tasks. The release has been delayed to at least May from the previously targeted March window. Meta stock fell approximately 1% in premarket trading March 13. Broader Magnificent Seven context: all seven have lost value YTD in 2026. Nvidia has stabilized near $182 after a sharp earlier decline in the quarter.

Why it matters:Meta has committed approximately $60-65 billion in capex in 2026 (before the broader $200B tech infrastructure cycle being reported industry-wide). A flagship model that underperforms Google Gemini, OpenAI GPT, and Anthropic Claude raises the question of whether Meta’s AI investment is translating into competitive capability. This is particularly important because Meta’s AI moat argument — open-source leadership via Llama and proprietary advantage via Avocado — is central to its premium multiple. A delay and benchmark miss does not end the thesis, but it signals the AI development race is harder and more expensive than management teams projected even six months ago. The story compounds the broader Mag-7 YTD underperformance narrative.

What to watch:Watch for the rescheduled “Avocado” launch event in May — benchmark performance vs. GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro will be the market-moving data point. Meta’s Q1 earnings (late April) will include capex guidance commentary that may address the delay’s cost implications.

MODERATE IMPACT
UNCERTAIN

10. DXY Crosses 100 for First Time in 2026 — Safe-Haven Dollar Surge Pressures Multinationals

The core facts:The US Dollar Index (DXY) breached 100.04 on March 13 — the first time in 2026 the index has crossed the psychologically significant 100 level. It is on track for its second consecutive weekly gain. Safe-haven demand from the Iran war conflict is the primary driver, with investors globally rotating into dollar-denominated assets during periods of geopolitical uncertainty. The move follows weeks of dollar strength building since the conflict escalated in late February. FXStreet reported DXY is approaching “10-month highs” as the safe-haven trade intensifies.

Why it matters:UNCERTAIN because a stronger dollar has directly opposing effects: bullish for dollar-based purchasing power and imported goods costs (deflationary at the margin), but bearish for S&P 500 multinational earnings — roughly 40% of S&P 500 revenues are generated outside the US, all of which translate back at a lower dollar value when DXY rises. With Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and Meta all generating significant international revenues, sustained DXY above 100 becomes an additional headwind for the Mag-7 names already under YTD pressure. It also creates dollar-denominated debt stress for emerging markets, potentially triggering EM capital outflows that feed back into US credit markets.

What to watch:Watch DXY 102-103 — sustained above that level historically triggers formal concern from US trading partners and emerging market stress signals. Q1 earnings calls will likely include the first wave of FX headwind disclosures from large multinationals.

MODERATE IMPACT
UNCERTAIN

11. Amazon Raises Prime Video Ad-Free Price 67% to $4.99/Month and Confirms $200B AI Capex for 2026

The core facts:Amazon announced on March 13 it will raise the price of its ad-free Prime Video tier from $2.99 to $4.99 per month (67% increase), effective April 10, rebranding the tier as “Prime Video Ultra.” Separately, CEO Andy Jassy confirmed 2026 capex of approximately $200 billion — roughly a 50% increase from $131-132 billion in 2025 — with the bulk earmarked for AI infrastructure, custom chips, and data centers. The capex commitment positions Amazon alongside Microsoft, Google, and Meta in the arms race for AI compute supremacy. Amazon is described as “jumping into chip wars” alongside its hyperscaler peers.

Why it matters:UNCERTAIN because the two announcements have opposite valuation implications. The Prime Video price hike is a near-term positive for Amazon’s media revenue (direct ARPU improvement) and signals pricing power in streaming — comparable to Netflix’s successful price increases. However, $200 billion in capex is an enormous capital commitment that puts near-term free cash flow under pressure. Investors evaluating Amazon must weigh improved media monetization against the capex cycle’s drag on free cash flow for 2-3 years. In the context of a weakening macro environment (GDP 0.7%, stagflation fears), a 67% price hike may face consumer pushback at precisely the wrong moment.

What to watch:Watch Prime Video subscriber churn data in Q1 and Q2 earnings calls. Monitor Amazon’s capex guidance revisions — any upward revision from $200B would further pressure FCF multiples. Chip capex commitments will also flow into Nvidia, AMD, and custom ASIC suppliers as second-order beneficiaries.

MODERATE IMPACT
UNCERTAIN

12. S&P 500 Index Rebalance: Vertiv, Lumentum, Coherent, EchoStar Added March 23

The core facts:S&P Global announced on March 13 that four companies will be added to the S&P 500 effective before the market open on Monday, March 23: Vertiv Holdings (VRT), Lumentum Holdings (LUMN), Coherent Corp. (COHR), and EchoStar (SATS). They will replace Match Group (MTCH), Molina Healthcare (MOH), Lamb Weston (LW), and Paycom Software (PAYC), which are being removed. Index additions typically drive mechanical buying from index-tracking funds in the days leading up to the effective date; removals trigger forced selling from the same funds.

Why it matters:Vertiv (VRT) is the most market-moving of the additions — it is a data center infrastructure company directly tied to the AI buildout (power management, cooling systems for AI data centers) and will immediately be exposed to index-fund inflows from the approximately $5 trillion in assets tracking the S&P 500. Lumentum and Coherent are optical components companies also tied to AI/data center fiber capacity buildout. The additions collectively reinforce the AI infrastructure theme within the index. Removed names (Match, Paycom) face index-fund selling pressure in the days ahead. UNCERTAIN because net index composition shift is neither clearly bullish nor bearish for the overall market.

What to watch:Watch VRT, LUMN, COHR, and SATS trading through March 23 for the typical index-addition premium (historically 3-5% in the week before effective date). MTCH, MOH, LW, and PAYC will face forced selling — opportunistic entry points may emerge after the selling pressure resolves.

RecessionALERT.com— Know the probability before the market prices in the risk. Apply for membership at join.recessionalert.com

E. EARNINGS WATCH -> TOP

Q4 2025 S&P 500 Earnings Scorecard (as of March 12, 2026): 97% reported | EPS beat: 75% | Rev beat: 65% | Blended growth: +11.9% YoY | Next update: ~March 19, 2026

Selection criteria: This section covers only market-moving earnings from large-cap companies (>$25B market cap) with sector significance or systemic implications. The S&P 500 scorecard above tracks all 500 index components, but individual stories below focus on names large enough to move markets and provide economic signals relevant to US large-cap portfolio managers. On any given day, 30-80+ companies may report earnings, but MIB filters for the 2-5 names most relevant to institutional investors.

YESTERDAY AFTER THE BELL (Markets Reacted Today)

EARNINGS
UNCERTAIN

13. Ulta Beauty (ULTA): -9.46% | Q4 Beat on Revenue and EPS — But FY2026 Comp Slowdown and “Global Uncertainty” Spooked Investors

The Numbers:Released AMC March 12. Q4 FY2025: revenue $3.90B vs. $3.81B est. — beat (+11.8% YoY). EPS $8.01 vs. $7.93 est. — beat. Comp sales +5.8% in Q4. Full-year FY2025: net sales +9.7% to $12.4B. FY2026 guidance: revenue $13.1-$13.2B, comp sales +2.5-3.5%, EPS $28.05-$28.55 (slightly below the ~$28.57 consensus). CEO Kecia Steelman explicitly cited “global uncertainty” and a “normalized” beauty environment. Stock closed at approximately $574, down 9.46% on March 13. Market cap: ~$27.7B.

The Problem/Win:The Q4 beat was overshadowed by the deceleration in comp sales guidance — from a +5.8% Q4 actual to a +2.5-3.5% FY2026 outlook. That near-halving of comparable store sales growth implies demand normalization and/or a consumer pulling back on discretionary beauty spending. In the context of UMich Consumer Sentiment at a 2026 low (55.5) and oil near $100 eating household budgets, a “normalized” beauty market guidance is credible but alarming.

The Ripple:Ulta is the largest specialty beauty retailer in the US and a key read-through for the mass premium consumer. A -9.46% reaction despite the headline beat signals the buy-side was positioned for stronger forward guidance. Peer ELF Beauty, e.l.f. Cosmetics, and COTY will be watched for corroborating softness signals in Q1 guidance.

What It Means:The gap between Ulta’s strong Q4 actuals and cautious FY2026 guidance reflects management’s expectation that the macro environment (oil shock, weaker consumer confidence) will bite discretionary spending in H1 2026. The -9.46% reaction is the market pricing in that guidance as credible, not dismissing it.

What to watch:Q1 2026 comps will be the first confirmation of whether +2.5-3.5% is realistic or conservative. Watch for any negative pre-announcements from peer beauty retailers in April ahead of the earnings season.

EARNINGS
UNCERTAIN

14. Adobe (ADBE): -5.31% | Record Q1 Revenue and EPS Beat — But CEO Narayen Exits After 18 Years

The Numbers:Released AMC March 12. Q1 FY2026 revenue: $6.40B vs. $6.28B est. — record Q1 beat (+12% YoY). Adjusted EPS: $6.06 vs. $5.86 est. — beat. Record Q1 operating cash flow: $2.96B. AI-first ARR more than tripled YoY; subscription revenue +13% YoY. Q2 guidance: revenue $6.43-$6.48B; non-GAAP EPS $5.80-$5.85 — described by analysts as “lackluster.” Multiple analyst price target cuts: Barclays downgraded to Equal Weight / $275 (from Overweight / $335); Morgan Stanley cut to $365; Wells Fargo to $330; TD Cowen to $325; Citi to $315.

The Problem/Win:Adobe delivered operationally strong results — record Q1 revenue, EPS, and cash flow across the board — but the dominant story is CEO Shantanu Narayen’s announcement that he will step down once a successor is identified, with Frank Calderoni heading both internal and external searches. Narayen has led Adobe for 18 years through its transformation from desktop software to creative cloud. The CEO departure combined with tepid Q2 guidance overshadowed the record financials. The stock had already fallen approximately 6% during the March 13 session before the report’s full digestion, ultimately closing at $255.45 (-5.31%).

The Ripple:Adobe’s AI-first ARR tripling is a positive signal for the enterprise creative AI monetization thesis and should flow through to sector peers. However, Barclays’ downgrade to Equal Weight signals the bull case is on hold during the leadership transition. The AI-native competition risk (Figma, Canva, generative AI tools) — which was already suppressing the stock — now combines with succession risk. Enterprise software stocks broadly felt pressure.

What It Means:Adobe’s record financials confirm creative AI is monetizing at scale, but the CEO transition creates a multi-quarter overhang. The stock will likely trade in a range until a high-profile successor is named — a fast internal hire would be received far better than an extended external search. UNCERTAIN sentiment: the underlying business is strong; the leadership risk is genuine and unquantifiable.

What to watch:Watch for the successor announcement timeline — no specific date was given. An announcement within 30-60 days would signal the board is moving decisively. Monitor Adobe’s Q2 report (late June) for whether the new ARR growth trajectory continues — if AI-first ARR growth slows, the thesis weakens structurally, not just from leadership risk.

EARNINGS
BEARISH

15. Lennar (LEN): -4.87% | Q1 Revenue and EPS Both Missed as Average Home Price Fell 8% YoY

The Numbers:Released AMC March 12. Q1 2026 revenue: $6.62B vs. $6.84B FactSet estimate — miss (-13.3% YoY). EPS: $0.93 vs. $0.97 estimate — miss. Average home sale price: $374,000, down 8% year-over-year. Homes delivered: 18,515. Gross margin: 15.2%. Inventory turns improved to 2.5x. No specific guidance raise. Headwinds cited: elevated mortgage rates, constrained affordability, cautious consumer sentiment in current macro environment.

The Problem/Win:The dual miss on revenue and EPS combined with an 8% average home price decline signals that the US housing market’s affordability ceiling is now a hard constraint. Lennar, as the largest US homebuilder, is the sector bellwether — its miss carries read-through implications for D.R. Horton, PulteGroup, and the broader residential real estate complex. The revenue miss of -13.3% YoY suggests the demand destruction from mortgage rate levels is accelerating, not stabilizing.

The Ripple:Lennar’s miss signals headwinds for the homebuilder sector broadly. Home Depot (HD) and Lowe’s (LOW) — which track new home formation and renovation cycles — face indirect pressure. Mortgage-related names (banks, insurers) absorb additional concern about the housing credit cycle. In a stagflationary environment, rate cuts that could revive housing affordability are now even further off.

What It Means:Housing is the most rate-sensitive sector in the US economy and among the first to show cracks. Lennar’s Q1 miss — before the full impact of the oil shock and stagflation environment has reached consumer confidence — suggests the sector deterioration is early-stage, not late-cycle. Portfolio managers with homebuilder exposure should re-underwrite 2026 assumptions at current mortgage rates with no near-term Fed relief.

What to watch:D.R. Horton and PulteGroup earnings in April will confirm or refute whether Lennar’s miss is company-specific or sector-wide. Watch March housing starts (releasing April) as the next hard data point. Monitor the 30-year fixed mortgage rate — a sustained move above 7.5% would add further demand pressure.

TODAY BEFORE THE BELL (Markets Already Reacted)

No major earnings before the bell from companies with >$25B market cap on March 13, 2026. Friday BMO earnings are typically rare; the week’s major releases (Dollar General, Dick’s Sporting Goods) were reported BMO on Thursday March 12 and covered in yesterday’s MIB.

TODAY AFTER THE BELL (Markets React Tomorrow)

No major earnings after the bell from companies with >$25B market cap on March 13, 2026. Friday AMC earnings releases are uncommon. Next major earnings events are Micron (MU) AMC Wednesday March 18 and FedEx (FDX) AMC Thursday March 19.

WEEK AHEAD PREVIEW:

Q4 2025 earnings season is effectively complete (~97% of S&P 500 reported). The remaining week is light on individual company earnings but extraordinarily macro-heavy — the FOMC meeting and Micron’s report will dominate market attention.

Micron Technology (MU) — AMC Wednesday, March 18 — Q2 FY2026 earnings; consensus EPS ~$8.61, consensus revenue ~$19.15B (+457% YoY EPS growth expected). The single most important semiconductor earnings report of the quarter — a direct read-through for AI infrastructure demand, HBM pricing, and the memory cycle. Micron has beaten estimates in each of the last four quarters (average surprise +14.4%). Results will move AMD, Nvidia, AMAT, and the broader semiconductor complex. Coincides with the FOMC decision — a volatile day regardless of Micron’s results.

FedEx (FDX) — AMC Thursday, March 19 — Q3 FY2026 earnings; analyst consensus EPS ~$4.10. A global shipping/logistics bellwether for industrial activity and trade volumes. The ongoing FedEx Freight spin-off (expected June 2026) is a structural watch item; tariff uncertainty and the Iran oil shock’s effect on fuel surcharges and freight volumes will be the key call topics.

Q1 2026 earnings season begins mid-to-late April. With the Iran oil shock, stagflation data, and labor market weakness all entering the picture in Q1, forward guidance will be the most scrutinized in years.

RecessionALERT.com— Separating signal from noise since 2007. Apply for membership at join.recessionalert.com

F. ECONOMY WATCH -> TOP

Tracking U.S. economic indicators and commentary from the past 3 days.

JOLTS January 2026: 6.946M Job Openings — Beat Expectations, But Quits Rate Signals Worker Caution (BLS, March 13, 2026)

What they’re saying:The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the January 2026 JOLTS report on March 13: job openings came in at 6.946 million vs. 6.700 million estimate — a beat, up from a revised 6.6 million in December. Hires totaled 5.294 million. The quits rate held at 2.0 — the seventh consecutive month at or below this level, a record streak of low labor mobility. Layoffs and discharges: 1.631 million (declining). The 2025 annual average was 7.1 million openings, down 571,000 from 2024.

The context:The headline beat is constructive — openings above 6.9 million suggest employers are still seeking workers. But the quits rate at 2.0 for seven consecutive months is the more telling signal: workers are not voluntarily leaving their jobs, which historically indicates they lack the confidence to do so. This is a “low-hire, low-fire” equilibrium — stable at the surface, potentially fragile underneath. The quits rate is a leading indicator of wage growth; sustained readings at 2.0 suggest wage pressures may be peaking or declining. Indeed’s Hiring Lab noted it is “waiting to exhale” — labor demand exists, but momentum is clearly cooling from the 2021-2022 peak.

What to watch:Next JOLTS report (February data) releases in mid-April — watch for whether openings fall below the 6.5 million level, which historically has preceded rising unemployment. Monitor the quits rate for any move below 1.8, which would signal active labor market deterioration rather than just caution.

University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Falls to 55.5 — 2026 Low, Inflation Expectations Snap Higher (UMich Surveys of Consumers, March 13, 2026)

What they’re saying:The University of Michigan’s preliminary March 2026 Consumer Sentiment reading came in at 55.5 — the lowest reading of 2026 and down from 56.6 in February. The Current Conditions Index rose slightly to 57.0, but the Consumer Expectations Index fell to 54.1. Critically, year-ahead inflation expectations held at 3.4% — ending a six-month declining trend. Long-term (5-10 year) inflation expectations edged down slightly to 3.2% from 3.3%. Personal finances fell 7.5% nationwide. Consumer Expectations Index has been below 80 for 13 consecutive months.

The context:A Consumer Sentiment reading below 60 has historically been associated with recessionary conditions rather than expansion. The 13-consecutive-month streak below 80 on Consumer Expectations is extraordinary — it spans the entirety of the oil shock escalation and tariff uncertainty environment. The year-ahead inflation expectation holding at 3.4% (rather than declining) is critical for the Fed: if consumer inflation expectations become unanchored, the Fed loses flexibility to respond to growth weakness without reigniting an inflation spiral. The March preliminary reading incorporates early awareness of WTI near $100 and the Iran conflict — the final reading (late March) will capture the full consumer psychology shift.

What to watch:Michigan Final March Sentiment releases in late March — if the preliminary 55.5 falls further in the final reading, it locks in a clear consumer recession signal. Monitor year-ahead inflation expectations specifically: if they break above 3.5%, it eliminates any remaining Fed optionality on rate cuts. The Conference Board Consumer Confidence (separate survey) releases March 31 as a corroborating or diverging data point.

Goldman Sachs Raises 12-Month Recession Odds to 25%; Moody’s at 42%, Kalshi 34% as Stagflation Data Converges (Multiple Sources, March 12, 2026)

What they’re saying:Goldman Sachs raised its 12-month US recession probability to 25% (+5 percentage points), citing February’s -92,000 payroll print and oil above $96 as the triggering factors. Goldman’s worst-case Hormuz closure scenario projects Brent rising to $110 and US headline CPI hitting a 4.5% spring peak. Their base case still tracks Q1 GDP at approximately 3.3% (before the oil shock is fully incorporated). Goldman pushed its first Fed rate cut forecast back to September 2026. Separately: Moody’s puts 2026 recession risk at 42%; Kalshi prediction markets at 34%; Polymarket at 31%. Oxford Economics published a scenario placing the probability of a “1970s-style stock market meltdown driven by stagflation” at 35%.

The context:The convergence of sell-side formal models (Goldman), credit rating agencies (Moody’s), and prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket) all pointing to 25-42% recession probability within the same week represents a statistically significant alignment. These are not correlated sources — Goldman’s quantitative model, Moody’s macro scenario analysis, and real-money prediction market odds are independent data streams. Deutsche Bank separately flagged that excluding healthcare sector jobs, the US labor market has shed approximately 202,000 jobs since January 2025 — a stark reframe of the headline payroll data. Bloomberg (March 13): “A 60-40 portfolio is no help as war drives stagflation threat” captures the practical implication: traditional diversification is failing.

What to watch:Monitor Kalshi recession odds weekly — a break above 40% has historically preceded actual Fed pivots by 2-3 months. Goldman’s next recession probability update (likely following the FOMC meeting) will be a key signal of whether the consensus is shifting from 25% toward 35-40%. Watch for any revision to Goldman’s Q1 GDP nowcast.

Atlanta Fed GDPNow Q1 2026 Revised UP to 2.7% — Recovery from March 6 Shock, But Oil Not Yet Fully Modeled (Atlanta Fed, March 13, 2026)

What they’re saying:The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model estimate for Q1 2026 real GDP growth was revised upward to 2.7% SAAR on March 13 — up from 2.1% on March 6. The March 13 update incorporated the January JOLTS data (6.946M openings beat) and the January trade balance revision. The prior close was 2.1%, itself a sharp drop from 3.0-3.2% in early March before the February payroll shock. For context: the Q4 2025 second estimate (released today) came in at +0.7%.

The context:UNCERTAIN because the 2.7% revision is superficially positive — a partial recovery from the March 6 shock — but it does not yet fully incorporate the oil shock’s passthrough to consumer spending and business investment. The Iran conflict reached its most acute phase in early-to-mid March; WTI spending effects on consumer behavior (driving less, spending more on energy, less disposable income) typically take 4-8 weeks to fully register in consumption data. The model’s next several updates are likely to trend lower as the oil shock flows through. The gap between GDPNow at 2.7% and today’s Q4 actual of 0.7% also underscores the model’s difficulty capturing supply-side shock effects in real time.

What to watch:Monitor GDPNow daily at the Atlanta Fed website. A move below 1.5% would dramatically intensify recession probability discussions heading into the May FOMC meeting. The next major model inputs will be February retail sales, industrial production, and housing data in the coming weeks.

“A 60-40 Portfolio Is No Help” — Bloomberg Quantifies How War-Driven Stagflation Is Breaking Traditional Portfolio Theory (Bloomberg, March 13, 2026)

What they’re saying:Bloomberg published an analysis on March 13 documenting how the traditional 60% equity / 40% bond portfolio framework is failing under the current stagflation environment. The core finding: in stagflationary regimes, the equity-bond correlation turns positive (both assets sell together) rather than negative (the diversification effect that makes 60-40 work). The Iranian oil shock driving simultaneous equity weakness and bond bear steepening (10Y sticky at 4.285%) is producing exactly this correlation breakdown. Global stocks lost approximately $6 trillion in the week of March 9 as stagflation trades swept markets. Separately, Deutsche Bank quantified that excluding healthcare-sector job creation, the US economy has lost approximately 202,000 positions since January 2025.

The context:The 60-40 framework worked for 40 years largely because recessions brought rate cuts (boosting bond prices) that offset equity losses. In stagflation, the Fed cannot cut (inflation too high), so bonds do not provide the buffer. The 1970s oil shocks produced exactly this dynamic — both stocks and bonds lost real value simultaneously for years, and only real assets (commodities, gold, inflation-protected bonds) preserved purchasing power. The Deutsche Bank healthcare-jobs framing is a sobering reframe: what appears to be a resilient labor market in aggregate is essentially one sector masking weakness across the rest of the economy.

What to watch:Monitor TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) real yields and I-Bond rates as inflation hedge proxies. Watch for institutional allocation disclosures in 13-F filings (due mid-May) showing whether the largest funds are rotating into commodities, energy, and real assets. The Conference Board Leading Economic Index for February releases March 19 — a formal confirmation of the deteriorating trajectory from a composite-model perspective.

RecessionALERT.com— US market commentary trusted by family offices and institutions. Apply for membership at join.recessionalert.com

G. WHAT’S NEXT -> TOP

UPCOMING THIS WEEK:

Tuesday, March 17: FOMC Meeting begins (Day 1); US Housing Starts February — Fed deliberates against the most complex stagflationary backdrop since the 1970s; housing data will add to the growth-weakness picture

Wednesday, March 18: FOMC Rate Decision (2:00 PM ET) + Powell Press Conference (2:30 PM ET); PPI February data (same morning) — The week’s defining market event; hold expected but Powell’s stagflation language is the real risk; PPI + FOMC on the same day creates compounding volatility potential; also Micron (MU) reports earnings AMC

Thursday, March 19: Weekly Jobless Claims; Conference Board Leading Economic Index February; FedEx (FDX) reports earnings AMC — Claims will provide the first post-oil-shock read on layoff trends; FedEx is the global shipping bellwether for trade volumes

Monday, March 23: S&P 500 index rebalance effective — Vertiv (VRT), Lumentum (LUMN), Coherent (COHR), EchoStar (SATS) added; Match Group (MTCH), Molina Healthcare (MOH), Lamb Weston (LW), Paycom (PAYC) removed; index-tracking fund flows create mechanical trading pressure

April 11: Trump’s Russian oil sanctions license expires — White House must decide to extend, expand, or let it lapse; the administration’s most direct policy lever on the oil price environment

KEY QUESTIONS FOR NEXT 5-7 DAYS:

1. Will Powell’s FOMC press conference on Wednesday acknowledge the stagflation dilemma explicitly — and if so, does he tilt hawkish (emphasizing inflation persistence) or dovish-leaning (emphasizing growth risk)? Either framing carries a 1-2% intraday equity market reaction potential.

2. Will Micron’s Q2 earnings on Wednesday confirm that AI infrastructure demand remains resilient despite the macro headwinds — or will the first signs of hyperscaler capex caution appear in the memory/DRAM demand outlook, signaling a broader semiconductor cycle turn?

3. Can any diplomatic development (Oman back-channel, UN proposal, US-Iran talks) begin to reopen the Strait of Hormuz — and if WTI falls back below $90 on such news, does the stagflation trade reverse as rapidly as it was built?

Market Intelligence Brief (MIB) Ver. 14.27
For professional investors only. Not investment advice.

© 2026 RecessionALERT.com

About RecessionALERT

Dwaine has a Bachelor of Science (BSc Hons) university degree majoring in computer science, math & statistics and is a full-time trader and investor. His passion for numbers and keen research & analytic ability has helped grow RecessionALERT into a company used by hundreds of hedge funds, brokerage firms and financial advisers around the world.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.

  All charts are now zoomable by clicking on them. Once you click on them they will resize to the maximum size to fit onto your screen. The chart image qualities are refined to allow for minimal image quality degradation from resizing.